Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added see also) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
(add to list) | (add to list) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Liberal bias]] | ||
| + | *[[Liberal hysteria]] | ||
| + | *[[Liberal hate speech]] | ||
| + | *[[Liberal style]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
[[category:politics]][[Category:Liberals]] | [[category:politics]][[Category:Liberals]] | ||
Revision as of 22:20, February 15, 2008
Liberal logic is an argument that has logical appeal to a liberal, but is nonsensical. Let's build a list:
- an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but saying a prayer in class can cause tremendous harm
- increasing spending by government must reduce poverty (no, dependency increases poverty)
- teaching abstinence-only does not reduce premarital sex
- widespread ownership of the largely defensive weapon of gun must not reduce crime
- that new laws reducing the gun ownership rate by 0.1% and a subsequent election of a left wing government are not linked
- that lack of government programs to rehabilitate criminals must not reduce crime
- that increasing taxes must increase government revenue (no, often people work less)
(add to list)