Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* teaching abstinence must not reduce premarital sex | * teaching abstinence must not reduce premarital sex | ||
* widespread ownership of the largely defensive weapon of gun must not reduce crime | * widespread ownership of the largely defensive weapon of gun must not reduce crime | ||
| + | * that lack of government programs to rehabilitate criminals must not reduce crime | ||
* that increasing taxes must increase government revenue (no, often people work less) | * that increasing taxes must increase government revenue (no, often people work less) | ||
(add to list) | (add to list) | ||
[[category:politics]][[Category:Liberals]] | [[category:politics]][[Category:Liberals]] | ||
Revision as of 17:09, February 15, 2008
Liberal logic is an argument that has logical appeal to a liberal, but is nonsensical. Let's build a list:
- increasing spending by government must reduce poverty (no, dependency increases poverty)
- teaching abstinence must not reduce premarital sex
- widespread ownership of the largely defensive weapon of gun must not reduce crime
- that lack of government programs to rehabilitate criminals must not reduce crime
- that increasing taxes must increase government revenue (no, often people work less)
(add to list)