Difference between revisions of "Talk:Thetoo.com"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:::Yeah, Fox, I think that's the right answer.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 10:32, 24 January 2008 (EST)
 
:::Yeah, Fox, I think that's the right answer.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 10:32, 24 January 2008 (EST)
  
−
Well, I think that it is relavint as it is a Christian message board, or at least tries to be. If you are asking in terms of relavency, why is the article [[bomb]] relavent? You could merge it with Adventures in Odyssey, I have no problem with that. [[User:Jasonjannajerryjohn|Jasonjannajerryjohn]]
+
Well, I think that it is relavent as it is a Christian message board, or at least tries to be. If you are asking in terms of relavency, why is the article [[bomb]] relavent? You could merge it with Adventures in Odyssey, I have no problem with that. [[User:Jasonjannajerryjohn|Jasonjannajerryjohn]]

Revision as of 21:49, January 27, 2008

So, let's talk.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shadowpaw (talk)

This sounds really... weird... and I don't think "poo" should be a word used in namespace. Why is this notable, and how does this further Conservapedia's mission?-MexMax 10:05, 24 January 2008 (EST)
MexMax, that guy who added the stuff about poo was a vandal. HelpJazz 11:18, 24 January 2008 (EST)
Hence merge into main article as suggested. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 10:19, 24 January 2008 (EST)
Yeah, Fox, I think that's the right answer.-MexMax 10:32, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Well, I think that it is relavent as it is a Christian message board, or at least tries to be. If you are asking in terms of relavency, why is the article bomb relavent? You could merge it with Adventures in Odyssey, I have no problem with that. Jasonjannajerryjohn