Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolution and creation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Naturalistic evolution, and it really needs work) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The statistics of 15%, 40% and 45% demonstrate exclusiveness. I don't think that can be right. Surely there are plenty of Old Earth Creationists who also believe in evolution. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:56, 12 January 2008 (EST) | The statistics of 15%, 40% and 45% demonstrate exclusiveness. I don't think that can be right. Surely there are plenty of Old Earth Creationists who also believe in evolution. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:56, 12 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | Hey Fly, howabout this guy above me? He disputes the statistics... | + | :Hey Fly, howabout this guy above me? He disputes the statistics... |
| + | :I added the citation banner in line with the second commandment, where are those numbers coming from as well as the rest of the info in the article? --A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. 21:31, 20 January 2008 (EST)--A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. | ||
| − | I | + | :I'm guessing that what is meant is ''naturalistic'' evolutionists, old-Earth creationists, and young-Earth creationists. But a source reference would allow us to clarify that. |
| + | :The article itself is wrong in so many ways. I guess I better improve it... | ||
| + | :[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:13, 20 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:13, January 21, 2008
Exclusivity
The statistics of 15%, 40% and 45% demonstrate exclusiveness. I don't think that can be right. Surely there are plenty of Old Earth Creationists who also believe in evolution. Ajkgordon 11:56, 12 January 2008 (EST)
- Hey Fly, howabout this guy above me? He disputes the statistics...
- I added the citation banner in line with the second commandment, where are those numbers coming from as well as the rest of the info in the article? --A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. 21:31, 20 January 2008 (EST)--A.C.R.O.N.Y.M.
- I'm guessing that what is meant is naturalistic evolutionists, old-Earth creationists, and young-Earth creationists. But a source reference would allow us to clarify that.
- The article itself is wrong in so many ways. I guess I better improve it...
- Philip J. Rayment 23:13, 20 January 2008 (EST)