Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sexual reproduction"
(→Jargon) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Too much technical jargon? I think the only alternative would be to describe sex in slang terms, which hardly seems appropriate given that this, unlike reality, is a family-friendly place. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 18:57, 16 January 2008 (EST) | Too much technical jargon? I think the only alternative would be to describe sex in slang terms, which hardly seems appropriate given that this, unlike reality, is a family-friendly place. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 18:57, 16 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The jargon is needed to keep a precise explanation but I think a more basic definition is needed for high school or lower grades reference material. I dont know if it would be appropriate to have a simplified version or Overview section and then go into the technical [[User:Markr|Markr]] 12:45, 5 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:45, December 5, 2008
"It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with procreation." Alright, I'll bite. Why?--All Fish Welcome 20:43, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
I don't really see why we need two articles for the same thing. Sulgran 20:53, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
Jargon
Too much technical jargon? I think the only alternative would be to describe sex in slang terms, which hardly seems appropriate given that this, unlike reality, is a family-friendly place. Barikada 18:57, 16 January 2008 (EST)
The jargon is needed to keep a precise explanation but I think a more basic definition is needed for high school or lower grades reference material. I dont know if it would be appropriate to have a simplified version or Overview section and then go into the technical Markr 12:45, 5 December 2008 (EST)