Difference between revisions of "Neutralism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(feel free to revert me if this is wrong...)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Neutralism''' is remaining neutral when [[faith]] or [[morality]] require taking a position or stand.  It is the ducking of moral or religious [[responsibility]]. It can be argued that neutralism implicitly is taking a stand in itself.
+
'''Neutralism''' is the position of remaining neutral when [[faith]] or [[morality]] requires that one take a stand.  Neutralism ducks moral or religious [[responsibility]]. Thus, neutralism implicitly takes a stand in itself.
  
−
The philosopher [[Benedict de Spinoza]] advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that [[mind]], [[matter]], [[time]] and everything that seems to be real is merely a manifestation of only one [[substance]], One Reality.
+
Philosopher [[Benedict de Spinoza]] advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that [[mind]], [[matter]], [[time]] and everything that seems to be real are mere manifestations of one [[substance]], one reality.
 
[[category:philosophy]]
 
[[category:philosophy]]
 
[[category:religion]]
 
[[category:religion]]

Revision as of 10:51, October 10, 2013

Neutralism is the position of remaining neutral when faith or morality requires that one take a stand. Neutralism ducks moral or religious responsibility. Thus, neutralism implicitly takes a stand in itself.

Philosopher Benedict de Spinoza advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that mind, matter, time and everything that seems to be real are mere manifestations of one substance, one reality.