Difference between revisions of "Talk:Consensus science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Look, I'm new here, *but* - is cobbling together a few quotes by a popular novelist with little in terms of explanation or context really an encyclopedia article? ~~~~) |
(reply to PaulH) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Look, I'm new here, *but* - is cobbling together a few quotes by a popular novelist with little in terms of explanation or context really an encyclopedia article? [[User:PaulH|PaulH]] 15:43, 28 November 2007 (EST) | Look, I'm new here, *but* - is cobbling together a few quotes by a popular novelist with little in terms of explanation or context really an encyclopedia article? [[User:PaulH|PaulH]] 15:43, 28 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I just learned from it. You can to. We don't delete entries to censor insights the way that [[Wikipedia]] does. Feel free to ''add'' to this entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:48, 28 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:48, November 28, 2007
Look, I'm new here, *but* - is cobbling together a few quotes by a popular novelist with little in terms of explanation or context really an encyclopedia article? PaulH 15:43, 28 November 2007 (EST)