Difference between revisions of "Cooper v. Aaron"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SkipJohnson (talk | contribs) |
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''Cooper v. Aaron'', 358 U.S. 1 (1958), was an assertion by the [[Warren Court]] that the federal judiciary, and the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], was "supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution." This was the a raw power grab by the Supreme Court of authority over the other two branches of government, and unnecessary to the resolution of the dispute in that case. | + | '''''Cooper v. Aaron''''', 358 U.S. 1 (1958), was an assertion by the [[Warren Court]] that the federal judiciary, and the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], was "supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution." This was the a raw power grab by the Supreme Court of authority over the other two branches of government, and unnecessary to the resolution of the dispute in that case. |
[[category:law]] | [[category:law]] | ||
[[category:judicial activism]] | [[category:judicial activism]] | ||
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 03:16, April 29, 2008
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958), was an assertion by the Warren Court that the federal judiciary, and the U.S. Supreme Court, was "supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution." This was the a raw power grab by the Supreme Court of authority over the other two branches of government, and unnecessary to the resolution of the dispute in that case.