Difference between revisions of "User talk:Affirmlife"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Welcome to Conservapedia, Accidents. Unfortunately, your so-called "facts" don't reflect the Party Line here, and therefore will be rejected. The Iraq War is something of a sore spot with the True Believers--they were promised a military triumph that would let them quit having to think about the Vietnam fiasco forever, and instead they're trapped dealing with a slow-motion repeat, without even a Democratic President to blame for getting them stuck in it. You need to add some text explaining how the insurgency is in their "death throes" (for the 19th time), or assert that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were photographed at a keg party together, pr that the WMDs were shipped to Syria, or something like that, if you don't want your essay shouted down like a Creationist on Wikipedia. --[[User:Scrap|Scrap]] 04:32, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | :Welcome to Conservapedia, Accidents. Unfortunately, your so-called "facts" don't reflect the Party Line here, and therefore will be rejected. The Iraq War is something of a sore spot with the True Believers--they were promised a military triumph that would let them quit having to think about the Vietnam fiasco forever, and instead they're trapped dealing with a slow-motion repeat, without even a Democratic President to blame for getting them stuck in it. You need to add some text explaining how the insurgency is in their "death throes" (for the 19th time), or assert that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were photographed at a keg party together, pr that the WMDs were shipped to Syria, or something like that, if you don't want your essay shouted down like a Creationist on Wikipedia. --[[User:Scrap|Scrap]] 04:32, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | It seems like [[User:Scrap|Scrap]] needs to be made aware of the deffinition of [[fact]], as used by this wiki. --[[User:orly|orly]] 09:37, 14 March 2007 | + | ::It seems like [[User:Scrap|Scrap]] needs to be made aware of the deffinition of [[fact]], as used by this wiki. --[[User:orly|orly]] 09:37, 14 March 2007 |
Revision as of 08:38, March 14, 2007
Why have you edited the Iraq War page? My additions were 100% true, and 100% cited. I am putting them back up. This kind of disingenuous censorship is not - I assume - what this website is supposed to be about. Feel free to air out your problems in the appropriate Talk Page of the Iraq War article.
--Accidents 01:07, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Because they don't reflect reality, they reflect projections. I don't know what this website is supposed to be about, but I do know that it's supposed to reflect confirmed facts. Affirmlife 04:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Considering I cited every single fact that I presented - all of which came from either peer-reviewed academic journals or profesionally-conducted public opinion polls with statistically normal standard deviations - I'm really puzzled as to why you're deleting my additions. Are you interested in the truth? I hope so. --Accidents 01:25, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- Welcome to Conservapedia, Accidents. Unfortunately, your so-called "facts" don't reflect the Party Line here, and therefore will be rejected. The Iraq War is something of a sore spot with the True Believers--they were promised a military triumph that would let them quit having to think about the Vietnam fiasco forever, and instead they're trapped dealing with a slow-motion repeat, without even a Democratic President to blame for getting them stuck in it. You need to add some text explaining how the insurgency is in their "death throes" (for the 19th time), or assert that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were photographed at a keg party together, pr that the WMDs were shipped to Syria, or something like that, if you don't want your essay shouted down like a Creationist on Wikipedia. --Scrap 04:32, 14 March 2007 (EDT)