Difference between revisions of "Talk:Carbon dioxide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == Not scientific == I replaced this line: :"The extent of its role in the current increase in average global temperatures is a topic of active political, but not scientific, debate." w...) |
(motion seconded) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The original line goes too far as is witnessed by the multitude of different and conflicting scientific opinions on CO2's effect in GW and the debate they cause. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 12:29, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | The original line goes too far as is witnessed by the multitude of different and conflicting scientific opinions on CO2's effect in GW and the debate they cause. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 12:29, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I agree, Aj. Granted, a lot of the political debate ignores the science, but there is also debate within scientific circles. [[User:HelpJazz|HelpJazz]] 16:46, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:46, September 21, 2007
Not scientific
I replaced this line:
- "The extent of its role in the current increase in average global temperatures is a topic of active political, but not scientific, debate."
with this:
- "The extent of its role in the current increase in average global temperatures is a topic of active political and scientific debate."
The original line goes too far as is witnessed by the multitude of different and conflicting scientific opinions on CO2's effect in GW and the debate they cause. Ajkgordon 12:29, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
- I agree, Aj. Granted, a lot of the political debate ignores the science, but there is also debate within scientific circles. HelpJazz 16:46, 21 September 2007 (EDT)