Difference between revisions of "Whitney v Heckler"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Links)
m (cat)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[[Category:Circuit Cases]]
 
[[Category:Circuit Cases]]
 +
[[category:Eleventh Circuit]]
 
[[Category:Medicine]]
 
[[Category:Medicine]]

Revision as of 19:23, April 12, 2008

In Whitney v. Heckler, a group of physicians challenged the constitutionality of the Deficit Reduction Act, which imposed a temporary freeze on the fees that non-participating physicians could charge Medicare patients. The Eleventh Circuit held that this freeze did not violate substantive due process based on its findings that:

  • it bore a reasonable relation to a valid legislative purpose
  • it was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory
  • it was not a bill of attainder because it did not inflict punishment on the plaintiff physicians.