Difference between revisions of "Talk:Larry Craig"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(who are you to make judgements?)
("not gay")
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
It's not only about sex, actually. The real problem with Craig is, I believe, that he keeps lying to the public. I mean, if he's gay he should admit it, simply because there's enough evidence and because he's a public figure, and put an end to this sory. --[[User:Whiteflower|Whiteflower]] 10:10, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 
It's not only about sex, actually. The real problem with Craig is, I believe, that he keeps lying to the public. I mean, if he's gay he should admit it, simply because there's enough evidence and because he's a public figure, and put an end to this sory. --[[User:Whiteflower|Whiteflower]] 10:10, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
−
:If he's gay its none of your business. And who are you to make judgements?[[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 12:55, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
 +
Can we shorten the bathroom incident? Or should we expand on his "I am not gay" comment?
 +
 
 +
He could have meant:
 +
#I didn't stare through the door or tap with my foot at all. The whole thing is a false report by the cop.
 +
#I was soliciting male-on-male sex, but my "[[sexual identity]]" is neither [[homosexual]] nor [[bisexual]].
 +
 
 +
Many men who have sex with other men make a big deal out of denying their [[homosexuality]]. This seems to be based on a sharp distinction between [[homosexual behavior]], i.e., two males being sexual together, and [[homosexual identity]]. I'm not sure why this matters. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:33, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Ending His Term, November ==
 +
 
 +
Is that phrase accurate? Reason I ask is that it was added by someone later blocked for "silliness". [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:44, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:Who knows? I only go by what I read in the press. Here what appeared in ''Forbes'' magazine:
 +
:*Minutes after he was arrested for lewd conduct, Sen. Larry Craig denied soliciting an undercover officer for sex in a men's bathroom and pleaded, "I'm not gay. I don't do these kinds of things." [http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/31/ap4071387.html]
 +
:I don't think ''Forbes'' would print a remark out of silliness. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:02, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:02, August 31, 2007

What a deceitful person. -Wwwknow 21:40, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

What are you suggesting, that he be impeached? Rob Smith 21:50, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

No. The Constitution limits impeachment only for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. And let's be practical: Craig would resign before he's impeached.-Wwwknow 20:37, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

But's only about sex, and there seems to rampant and rabid anti-gay sentiment behind much of this criticism. Rob Smith 20:43, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

It's not only about sex, actually. The real problem with Craig is, I believe, that he keeps lying to the public. I mean, if he's gay he should admit it, simply because there's enough evidence and because he's a public figure, and put an end to this sory. --Whiteflower 10:10, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

Can we shorten the bathroom incident? Or should we expand on his "I am not gay" comment?

He could have meant:

  1. I didn't stare through the door or tap with my foot at all. The whole thing is a false report by the cop.
  2. I was soliciting male-on-male sex, but my "sexual identity" is neither homosexual nor bisexual.

Many men who have sex with other men make a big deal out of denying their homosexuality. This seems to be based on a sharp distinction between homosexual behavior, i.e., two males being sexual together, and homosexual identity. I'm not sure why this matters. --Ed Poor Talk 12:33, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

Ending His Term, November

Is that phrase accurate? Reason I ask is that it was added by someone later blocked for "silliness". ATang 12:44, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

Who knows? I only go by what I read in the press. Here what appeared in Forbes magazine:
  • Minutes after he was arrested for lewd conduct, Sen. Larry Craig denied soliciting an undercover officer for sex in a men's bathroom and pleaded, "I'm not gay. I don't do these kinds of things." [1]
I don't think Forbes would print a remark out of silliness. --Ed Poor Talk 13:02, 31 August 2007 (EDT)