Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:The Supreme Court"
(reply re: textbook) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Textbook?-[[User:Baruch|Baruch]] 15:31, 17 August 2007 (EDT) | :Textbook?-[[User:Baruch|Baruch]] 15:31, 17 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I'm looking at some affordable options now. Suggestions welcome. I will probably recommend an '''optional''' textbook or two, and the only mandatory portion will be the free online lectures, assignments and exams.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:32, 18 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:32, August 18, 2007
I can't believe that you intend to educate people with this 'course', when 18 words into the course syllabus you lay out opinion like that. Education is surelyabout letting students make up their own minds, not shoving preconceived notions down their throats. Since I already know before I would take this course what I will learn- why would I take it? MissInfo 22:08, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
How is it opinion to state that the court became more liberal during that time period? That's a fact. DanH 22:12, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
What do you doubt, MissInfo? Your comment conspicuously lacks any quotes of anything you deny in the course description. That type of criticism isn't going to persuade anyone here. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 22:17, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
- Textbook?-Baruch 15:31, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
- I'm looking at some affordable options now. Suggestions welcome. I will probably recommend an optional textbook or two, and the only mandatory portion will be the free online lectures, assignments and exams.--Aschlafly 10:32, 18 August 2007 (EDT)