Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fluoride"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Avoiding Fluoride) |
(good, thanks) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The citation give by [[Carmentalksnews]] is very questionable - that's why I removed that segment. A promotional website for a newsletter, with "points" depicting what you'll get inside when you purchase it, is not a good source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 14:38, 26 July 2007 (EDT) | The citation give by [[Carmentalksnews]] is very questionable - that's why I removed that segment. A promotional website for a newsletter, with "points" depicting what you'll get inside when you purchase it, is not a good source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 14:38, 26 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Good move. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 26 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:45, July 26, 2007
Sexual Aggression?
Is there a cite for this somewhere? EnFrancaisSVP 19:49, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
- The whole article needs to be verified - there's a lot of..."questionable" material presented as fact in there. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 20:05, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
If someone can cite some of this stuff, great, but most of it seems kinda outlandish and conspiracy theory -esque. EnFrancaisSVP 20:12, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
Avoiding Fluoride
The citation give by Carmentalksnews is very questionable - that's why I removed that segment. A promotional website for a newsletter, with "points" depicting what you'll get inside when you purchase it, is not a good source. ATang 14:38, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
- Good move. Thanks.--Aschlafly 14:45, 26 July 2007 (EDT)