Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ghosts"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Whilst i don't personally believe in ghosts, the statement that ghosts 'don't of course exist' could be seen as debatable. What about the Holy Ghost, for example? The point that belief in ghosts is just that, a belief, is clearly made at the beginning of this article, so the final statement is perhaps un-necessary?--[[User:Eyupdutch|Eyupdutch]] 08:34, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
+
Whilst i don't personally believe in ghosts, the statement that ghosts 'don't of course exist' could be seen as debatable. What about the Holy Ghost, for example? The point that belief in ghosts is merely a belief, not a fact, is clearly made at the beginning of this article, so the final statement is perhaps un-necessary?--[[User:Eyupdutch|Eyupdutch]] 08:34, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:36, June 19, 2007

Whilst i don't personally believe in ghosts, the statement that ghosts 'don't of course exist' could be seen as debatable. What about the Holy Ghost, for example? The point that belief in ghosts is merely a belief, not a fact, is clearly made at the beginning of this article, so the final statement is perhaps un-necessary?--Eyupdutch 08:34, 19 June 2007 (EDT)