Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:User complaints"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:As soon as an editor deviates from the topic on a Talk page discussion with personal accusations about a users conduct or ideological leanings, we cut n paste the comment and move it here, and let the trolls thrash it out. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 01:56, February 27, 2023 (EST)
 
:As soon as an editor deviates from the topic on a Talk page discussion with personal accusations about a users conduct or ideological leanings, we cut n paste the comment and move it here, and let the trolls thrash it out. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 01:56, February 27, 2023 (EST)
 +
 +
::Fo example, let's take a certain unnamed editor whose initials begin with L and end with T, learned all sorts of bad habits of mixing the subject of a discussion with personal attacks and innuendo on other users. he learned it here first, and perfected it a RW. And he learned it here first BECAUSE CP allowed RW trolls 15 years ago to shape CP's user conduct policies. Rather than ever address the problem with policies and a structure to handle the problem, CP just blocked editors en masse, destroyed its own user base, and never addressed the simple problem of regulating user conduct. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 02:05, February 27, 2023 (EST)

Revision as of 07:05, February 27, 2023

Suggestion

A user complaint page is a good idea. My only suggestion is to make up more constructive and positive. For example, call it a User feedback page instead. Taking this approach could make the content produced more constructive and avoid unconstructive bellyaching and whining. Conservative (talk) 01:11, February 27, 2023 (EST)

That's what we want, all the unconstructive bellyaching and whining, and ganging up on an individual editor on one page, rather than the routine habit of allowing it on Talk page discussions we've had for years on end now. That's why I suggested "kangaroo court" to give the appearance of having some final word without actually having authority.
As soon as an editor deviates from the topic on a Talk page discussion with personal accusations about a users conduct or ideological leanings, we cut n paste the comment and move it here, and let the trolls thrash it out. RobSGive Peace a chance 01:56, February 27, 2023 (EST)
Fo example, let's take a certain unnamed editor whose initials begin with L and end with T, learned all sorts of bad habits of mixing the subject of a discussion with personal attacks and innuendo on other users. he learned it here first, and perfected it a RW. And he learned it here first BECAUSE CP allowed RW trolls 15 years ago to shape CP's user conduct policies. Rather than ever address the problem with policies and a structure to handle the problem, CP just blocked editors en masse, destroyed its own user base, and never addressed the simple problem of regulating user conduct. RobSGive Peace a chance 02:05, February 27, 2023 (EST)