Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Fallacy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(question about template)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Do we mean formal fallacies, formal and informal fallacies or all errors of logic? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:24, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 
Do we mean formal fallacies, formal and informal fallacies or all errors of logic? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:24, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
By "fallacy" I mean any argument that is invalid because its form is invalid. ''False premises'' are another matter. Logical fallacies involve the presentation of material, that may or may not be factual, in an uncoordinated manner.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 23:58, 5 March 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 04:58, March 6, 2007

Do we mean formal fallacies, formal and informal fallacies or all errors of logic? JoshuaZ 23:24, 5 March 2007 (EST)

By "fallacy" I mean any argument that is invalid because its form is invalid. False premises are another matter. Logical fallacies involve the presentation of material, that may or may not be factual, in an uncoordinated manner.--TerryH 23:58, 5 March 2007 (EST)