Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Da Vinci Code"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Duplication: my opinion) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: "Da vinci code" is clearly wrong. "The Da Vinci Code" is better. I'm not sure we need such a long article on the topic at all though. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 20:39, 5 March 2007 (EST) | : "Da vinci code" is clearly wrong. "The Da Vinci Code" is better. I'm not sure we need such a long article on the topic at all though. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 20:39, 5 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ok, then would you like me to do the opposite with the two articles: delete the second one and move the first to its title? --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 20:41, 5 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:41, March 6, 2007
Duplication
We seem to have dupliacte articles on this topic, one here and one at Da vinci code. JoshuaZ 18:20, 5 March 2007 (EST)
Which one should be deleted in your opinion: Da vinci code or The Da Vinci Code? The first option is the best title, but the second one has a better setup. The text looks as if it has been copied exactly. I could delete the first one and move the second to its title. Let me know what you think. --<<-David R->> 20:25, 5 March 2007 (EST)
- "Da vinci code" is clearly wrong. "The Da Vinci Code" is better. I'm not sure we need such a long article on the topic at all though. JoshuaZ 20:39, 5 March 2007 (EST)
Ok, then would you like me to do the opposite with the two articles: delete the second one and move the first to its title? --<<-David R->> 20:41, 5 March 2007 (EST)