Difference between revisions of "User talk:50somethingmore"
(a way out of this hell) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I've looked at some of your other edits, you take a highly negative/critical stance on the Adultery page. This site has a tendency to block users who disagree with the conservative point of view in an attempt to keep liberal ideas off the site. If you want to remain on the site, I would suggest discussing reinstatement with RobS or Aschafly. If you apologize and promise not to be critical of the conservative viewpoint, they may reinstate your account. Please contact me if I can be of any more assistance.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 21:11, 1 June 2007 (EDT) | I've looked at some of your other edits, you take a highly negative/critical stance on the Adultery page. This site has a tendency to block users who disagree with the conservative point of view in an attempt to keep liberal ideas off the site. If you want to remain on the site, I would suggest discussing reinstatement with RobS or Aschafly. If you apologize and promise not to be critical of the conservative viewpoint, they may reinstate your account. Please contact me if I can be of any more assistance.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 21:11, 1 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It also helps if you show some willingness to ''label'' the alternate views as coming from sources other than, say, the Bible. For example, a view that [[adultery]] is equally wrong in a man as in a woman might not correlate with any particular Bible ''verse'', but you might find a religious ''author'' (or statement of doctrine/policy) which condemns male and female equally. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Something like this would go down well: | ||
| + | :*Although the Old Testament stressed female virtue more than that of males, most modern Americans came to regard adultery as equally wrong in both sexes (insert source here). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:29, 1 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:29, June 2, 2007
I don't understand - I just discovered I've been blocked for something? What did I do? 50somethingmore 21:07, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
Probably suspected sockpuppet account. Talk to whoever blocked you.--Elamdri 21:04, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
What does that mean? 50somethingmore 21:07, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
- Conservapedia:Sockpuppets should help'ya. --ויִכִּ נתֶּרֶפּרֶתֵּר שְׁלֹום!
Oh well, I guess I still don't understand. Never mind. 50somethingmore 21:10, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
I've looked at some of your other edits, you take a highly negative/critical stance on the Adultery page. This site has a tendency to block users who disagree with the conservative point of view in an attempt to keep liberal ideas off the site. If you want to remain on the site, I would suggest discussing reinstatement with RobS or Aschafly. If you apologize and promise not to be critical of the conservative viewpoint, they may reinstate your account. Please contact me if I can be of any more assistance.--Elamdri 21:11, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
- It also helps if you show some willingness to label the alternate views as coming from sources other than, say, the Bible. For example, a view that adultery is equally wrong in a man as in a woman might not correlate with any particular Bible verse, but you might find a religious author (or statement of doctrine/policy) which condemns male and female equally.