Difference between revisions of "Talk:UK Monarchs"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Victoria was the last of the Hanovarians. Saxe-Coburg Gotha succeeded with Edward VII. And there were no "UK Monarchs" before 1801!! [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 18:32, 1 June 2007 (EDT) | Victoria was the last of the Hanovarians. Saxe-Coburg Gotha succeeded with Edward VII. And there were no "UK Monarchs" before 1801!! [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 18:32, 1 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I find the "By Time" list redundant. It tells one absolutely nothing that the dynastic list doesn't. I didn't want to tread on any toes by deleting it, though. (And I will be checking Lady Jane Grey's status in between chores today.)[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 21:24, 1 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:24, June 2, 2007
Great Britain came about with the "Act of Union with Scotland" in 1707, although the name had been suggested by James I a century earlier. "The Act of Union with Ireland" in 1701 instituted the formation of the United Kingdom. It may be simplistic, but the term "Such-and-such of England" has been used in lists for centuries.
Am I quibbling?
Victoria was the last of the Hanovarians. Saxe-Coburg Gotha succeeded with Edward VII. And there were no "UK Monarchs" before 1801!! AlanE 18:32, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
I find the "By Time" list redundant. It tells one absolutely nothing that the dynastic list doesn't. I didn't want to tread on any toes by deleting it, though. (And I will be checking Lady Jane Grey's status in between chores today.)AlanE 21:24, 1 June 2007 (EDT)