Difference between revisions of "Talk:Keith Olbermann"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{protect}} | ||
| + | |||
What factual mistakes were in the removed paragraph?--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 00:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | What factual mistakes were in the removed paragraph?--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 00:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:42, May 28, 2007
| ! | Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism. Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting [[User talk:{{{1}}}|the protecting sysop]]. |
|
What factual mistakes were in the removed paragraph?--Nomine Cervus 00:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
If one is going to make a factual assertion ("Democrat", "activist"), provide cites.--WJThomas 13:51, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
- Wow, that's a wacky argument. "Olbermann never adressed the fact that Jack Bauer has demonstrated that the proper use of force against terrorists produce the results we need in the war on terror." Maybe that's because Jack Bauer is a fictional character in a story?
- And to think some people this that it's the Dungeons and Dragons players who can't tell reality from fantasy.... ---Ghoti 19:06, 26 May 2007 (EDT)