Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stub"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
If I recall correctly, I saw discussion here yesterday (I forget where) that we need a stub template again. What do others think, in cases for articles like [[List of Nintendo DS games]], which are an incomplete list. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 12:43, May 30, 2021 (EDT)
 
If I recall correctly, I saw discussion here yesterday (I forget where) that we need a stub template again. What do others think, in cases for articles like [[List of Nintendo DS games]], which are an incomplete list. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 12:43, May 30, 2021 (EDT)
−
:We have Admins who create uncategorized, orphaned stubs. So of course new users see this and do so likewise. And Admin's job in fact is to help and teach new users to Categorize and de-orphan, among a zillion other things.  
+
:We have Admins who create uncategorized, orphaned stubs. So of course new users see this and do so likewise. An Admin's job in fact is to help and teach new users to Categorize and de-orphan, among a zillion other things.  
  
 
:Orphaned, uncategorized stubs are inaccessible to Google, and nobody can find it once it falls off of Recent Changes. Additionally, it creates a problem with forks and Merges of articles with a similiar title cause others are unaware the Stub exists. So whatever the original author's intent, his efforts are wasted cause no one is going to expand the article.  
 
:Orphaned, uncategorized stubs are inaccessible to Google, and nobody can find it once it falls off of Recent Changes. Additionally, it creates a problem with forks and Merges of articles with a similiar title cause others are unaware the Stub exists. So whatever the original author's intent, his efforts are wasted cause no one is going to expand the article.  

Latest revision as of 17:00, May 30, 2021

If I recall correctly, I saw discussion here yesterday (I forget where) that we need a stub template again. What do others think, in cases for articles like List of Nintendo DS games, which are an incomplete list. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 12:43, May 30, 2021 (EDT)

We have Admins who create uncategorized, orphaned stubs. So of course new users see this and do so likewise. An Admin's job in fact is to help and teach new users to Categorize and de-orphan, among a zillion other things.
Orphaned, uncategorized stubs are inaccessible to Google, and nobody can find it once it falls off of Recent Changes. Additionally, it creates a problem with forks and Merges of articles with a similiar title cause others are unaware the Stub exists. So whatever the original author's intent, his efforts are wasted cause no one is going to expand the article.
Recently why looking into this problem and why it exists, I found this. RobSFree Kyle! 12:56, May 30, 2021 (EDT)
Of course, the taboo on discussion for the past decade plus has not been helpful either in resolving simple problems. RobSFree Kyle! 12:58, May 30, 2021 (EDT)