Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pork"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(is confused)
(please reword it)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The article gives the impression of being written to excite disgust or revulsion. Words like 'carcass', etc. Is someone trying to send a subtle message here? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:26, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
 
The article gives the impression of being written to excite disgust or revulsion. Words like 'carcass', etc. Is someone trying to send a subtle message here? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:26, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
  
−
I've been accused of many things but subtle I ain't! ; P  I can remove them or rephrase them if you prefer but it's pretty standard terminology when talking about cuts of meat. [[User:Fingermouse|Fingermouse]] 12:31, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
+
:I've been accused of many things but subtle I ain't! ; P  I can remove them or rephrase them if you prefer but it's pretty standard terminology when talking about cuts of meat. [[User:Fingermouse|Fingermouse]] 12:31, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::Can you reword it so the reader would ''like'' to eat pork? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:32, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:32, May 24, 2007

The article gives the impression of being written to excite disgust or revulsion. Words like 'carcass', etc. Is someone trying to send a subtle message here? --Ed Poor 12:26, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

I've been accused of many things but subtle I ain't! ; P I can remove them or rephrase them if you prefer but it's pretty standard terminology when talking about cuts of meat. Fingermouse 12:31, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
Can you reword it so the reader would like to eat pork? --Ed Poor 12:32, 24 May 2007 (EDT)