Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baraminology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:The best reference to date is the review article [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-crs/baraminology.html "Baraminology -- Classification of Created Organisms"], by Wayne Frair, Ph.D, Originally published in ''CRS Quarterly'', Vol. 37, Num. 2, Sept. 2000. I have added this reference to the article. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 14:09, 27 February 2007 (EST)
 
:The best reference to date is the review article [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-crs/baraminology.html "Baraminology -- Classification of Created Organisms"], by Wayne Frair, Ph.D, Originally published in ''CRS Quarterly'', Vol. 37, Num. 2, Sept. 2000. I have added this reference to the article. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 14:09, 27 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
As someone well-trained in biology, I would be interested in more support for this theory, for instance, physical/genetic evidence.  Thanks.
 +
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 11:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:20, March 20, 2007

This article is excellent, but I would like to know what sources the author used before I go in and editing. After all, perhaps he has better sources than I do. --Ashens 10:40 27 February 2007 (EST)

The best reference to date is the review article "Baraminology -- Classification of Created Organisms", by Wayne Frair, Ph.D, Originally published in CRS Quarterly, Vol. 37, Num. 2, Sept. 2000. I have added this reference to the article. Dr. Richard Paley 14:09, 27 February 2007 (EST)

As someone well-trained in biology, I would be interested in more support for this theory, for instance, physical/genetic evidence. Thanks. Palmd001 11:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT)