Difference between revisions of "Juliet Emma Dawkins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Juliet Emma Dawkins''' is [[Richard Dawkins]]' daughter. | '''Juliet Emma Dawkins''' is [[Richard Dawkins]]' daughter. | ||
| − | [[Vox Day]] wrote about | + | [[Vox Day|Theodore Beale]] wrote in the his book ''The Irrational Atheist'' about Dawkins's claim that teaching children about [[Hell]] is more harmful to children than "mild child abuse": |
| − | {{Cquote| | + | {{Cquote|Richard Dawkins is perhaps one of the last men on Earth who should be discussing what is the right and proper way to raise children, given that the number of his wives outnumber his offspring. |
| + | |||
| + | In his letter to his daughter Juliet, addressed to her at the age of ten and published in ''A Devil’s Chaplain'', there is little mention of love, no admission of regret, and no paternal promises. As one British journalist noted, the letter is “coldly impersonal” and “authoritarian.” There is no expression of interest in what might be important to her.<ref>[http://www.voxday.net/mart/TIA_free.pdf The Irrational Atheist. Chapter VIII DARWIN’S JUDAS] by Vox Day</ref>}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | See also: [[Richard Dawkins and love]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Richard Dawkins and hell]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and children]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and irrationality]] | ||
Revision as of 15:32, July 30, 2019
Juliet Emma Dawkins is Richard Dawkins' daughter.
Theodore Beale wrote in the his book The Irrational Atheist about Dawkins's claim that teaching children about Hell is more harmful to children than "mild child abuse":
| “ | Richard Dawkins is perhaps one of the last men on Earth who should be discussing what is the right and proper way to raise children, given that the number of his wives outnumber his offspring.
In his letter to his daughter Juliet, addressed to her at the age of ten and published in A Devil’s Chaplain, there is little mention of love, no admission of regret, and no paternal promises. As one British journalist noted, the letter is “coldly impersonal” and “authoritarian.” There is no expression of interest in what might be important to her.[1] |
” |
See also: Richard Dawkins and love