Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(hogwash) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That is liberal [[hog]]wash. What about [[Battered fish]]? [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 07:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | :That is liberal [[hog]]wash. What about [[Battered fish]]? [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 07:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::If you want an article on how to cook goats then call the article goat stew. If you are going to write an article on goats than it should have at least some useful information about goats, their habits, their types and where and how they live, breed etc., together with goats in history, evolution etc. Information on how to cook them should NOT be the single item in the article. What you wrote was hogwash [[User:Felix|Felix]] | ||
Revision as of 11:18, May 8, 2007
I think this page needs to be removed. As a vegetarian I do not see why an article on young goats should dwell on the fact that they are eaten, much less giving a recipe for doing it. Let me give an equivalent. Would the article on cats spend time giving recipes, just because in some parts of the world people eat them?
- That is liberal hogwash. What about Battered fish? Auld Nick 07:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- If you want an article on how to cook goats then call the article goat stew. If you are going to write an article on goats than it should have at least some useful information about goats, their habits, their types and where and how they live, breed etc., together with goats in history, evolution etc. Information on how to cook them should NOT be the single item in the article. What you wrote was hogwash Felix