Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kid"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(hogwash)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think this page needs to be removed. As a vegetarian I do not see why an article on young goats should dwell on the fact that they are eaten, much less giving a recipe for doing it. Let me give an equivalent. Would the article on cats spend time giving recipes, just because in some parts of the world people eat them?
 
I think this page needs to be removed. As a vegetarian I do not see why an article on young goats should dwell on the fact that they are eaten, much less giving a recipe for doing it. Let me give an equivalent. Would the article on cats spend time giving recipes, just because in some parts of the world people eat them?
 +
 +
:That is liberal [[hog]]wash. What about [[Battered fish]]? [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 07:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:13, May 8, 2007

I think this page needs to be removed. As a vegetarian I do not see why an article on young goats should dwell on the fact that they are eaten, much less giving a recipe for doing it. Let me give an equivalent. Would the article on cats spend time giving recipes, just because in some parts of the world people eat them?

That is liberal hogwash. What about Battered fish? Auld Nick 07:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)