Difference between revisions of "Liberapedia"
m (rm old move request) |
(got rid of some liberal bias) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Liberapedia''' is a [[wiki]] project which describes itself as a " | + | '''Liberapedia''' is a [[wiki]] project which describes itself as a "Your source for Liberal ideas, Social Democrat and Socialist viewpoints." Unlike Conservapedia, our opinions are facts, and as such, should NOT be considered "viewpoints." But their opinions? THEY ARE BAD AND SUTPID! |
==General information== | ==General information== | ||
| − | Liberapedia is significantly smaller than [[Conservapedia]], only containing about 3,300 articles. Most articles on the website are poorly-written, and some of them are incredibly short, containing only up to 500 characters written by a single editor. | + | Liberapedia is '''significantly''' smaller than [[Conservapedia]], only containing about 3,300 articles. LOLOLOL XDD! Most articles on the website are poorly-written, and some of them are incredibly short, containing only up to 500 characters written by a single editor. According to research, the average Conservapedia editor has an IQ that's 150 points higher than an average libtard editor from THAT RATCHED LIBERAPEDIA. |
The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia) and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to [[Wikipedia]] or another wiki for factual information. | The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia) and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to [[Wikipedia]] or another wiki for factual information. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Liberapedia on Conservapedia== | ==Liberapedia on Conservapedia== | ||
| − | "Conservapedia sucks | + | "Conservapedia sucks " |
The website constantly accuses [[Conservapedia]], as well as anything labeled by them as "conservative", of being incorrect or ignorant. For example, the conservatives are called "hypocrites", "poorly educated", "racist", and many other names without any explanation or evidence. | The website constantly accuses [[Conservapedia]], as well as anything labeled by them as "conservative", of being incorrect or ignorant. For example, the conservatives are called "hypocrites", "poorly educated", "racist", and many other names without any explanation or evidence. | ||
| − | Liberal trolls and vandals (along with a few regular liberal contributors on Conservapedia) frequently try to impose their views | + | Liberal trolls and vandals (along with a few regular liberal contributors on Conservapedia) frequently try to impose their views OVER OUR VIEWS!!! OMG! HOW COULD THEY DO SUCH A SIN! OUR VIEWPOINTS ARE NOT JUST OPINION, THEY ARE '''''FACT.''''' UGH, THOSE LIBTARDS |
==Liberapedia on liberals== | ==Liberapedia on liberals== | ||
| − | Liberapedia has referred to itself as quote " | + | Liberapedia has referred to itself as quote "Your source for Liberal ideas, Social Democrat and Socialist viewpoints." |
| − | "Liberal men are by far better in bed and tend to be in better physical, mental, social, psychological, and spiritual health than conservative men. In contrast, conservative men tend to be obese, inhibited, abusive, and they'd rather view porn than please their wives." They provide no evidence of this, and this information can be contradicted very easily as well as exposed for what it is, liberal [[projection]]. | + | "Liberal men are by far better in bed and tend to be in better physical, mental, social, psychological, and spiritual health than conservative men. In contrast, conservative men tend to be obese, inhibited, abusive, and they'd rather view porn than please their wives." Whats that? You want a source to that? Fuck you! They provide no evidence of this, and this information can be contradicted very easily as well as exposed for what it is, liberal [[projection]]. So, I guess they rarely provide evidence to our claims! JUST LIKE US!!! |
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 00:44, February 13, 2019
Liberapedia is a wiki project which describes itself as a "Your source for Liberal ideas, Social Democrat and Socialist viewpoints." Unlike Conservapedia, our opinions are facts, and as such, should NOT be considered "viewpoints." But their opinions? THEY ARE BAD AND SUTPID!
General information
Liberapedia is significantly smaller than Conservapedia, only containing about 3,300 articles. LOLOLOL XDD! Most articles on the website are poorly-written, and some of them are incredibly short, containing only up to 500 characters written by a single editor. According to research, the average Conservapedia editor has an IQ that's 150 points higher than an average libtard editor from THAT RATCHED LIBERAPEDIA.
The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia) and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to Wikipedia or another wiki for factual information.
Liberapedia on Conservapedia
"Conservapedia sucks "
The website constantly accuses Conservapedia, as well as anything labeled by them as "conservative", of being incorrect or ignorant. For example, the conservatives are called "hypocrites", "poorly educated", "racist", and many other names without any explanation or evidence.
Liberal trolls and vandals (along with a few regular liberal contributors on Conservapedia) frequently try to impose their views OVER OUR VIEWS!!! OMG! HOW COULD THEY DO SUCH A SIN! OUR VIEWPOINTS ARE NOT JUST OPINION, THEY ARE FACT. UGH, THOSE LIBTARDS
Liberapedia on liberals
Liberapedia has referred to itself as quote "Your source for Liberal ideas, Social Democrat and Socialist viewpoints."
"Liberal men are by far better in bed and tend to be in better physical, mental, social, psychological, and spiritual health than conservative men. In contrast, conservative men tend to be obese, inhibited, abusive, and they'd rather view porn than please their wives." Whats that? You want a source to that? Fuck you! They provide no evidence of this, and this information can be contradicted very easily as well as exposed for what it is, liberal projection. So, I guess they rarely provide evidence to our claims! JUST LIKE US!!!