Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anti-constitutionalist"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Potential example: new section)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Would [[John Paul Stevens]] be a good example for this article? He called for repealing the Second Amendment, admitting that only outright repeal would effectively and legally enact gun control laws. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:06, 14 December 2018 (EST)
 
Would [[John Paul Stevens]] be a good example for this article? He called for repealing the Second Amendment, admitting that only outright repeal would effectively and legally enact gun control laws. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:06, 14 December 2018 (EST)
 +
:Yes. How about we create subsections between the two sections now, and simply label them by Amendment name with paragraphs on leading spokespeople (historic or contemporary) or arguments why the amendment is outdated or should be repeated? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 21:35, 14 December 2018 (EST)

Latest revision as of 02:35, December 15, 2018

Immediately, we see the contradiction between characteristics #1 & #7: you have the collective duty to pay for someone else's abortion.

None of this is theoretical anymore. Democrats made it progressive law in 2010. And that's what Medicare for All is. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 17:02, 14 December 2018 (EST)

Potential example

Would John Paul Stevens be a good example for this article? He called for repealing the Second Amendment, admitting that only outright repeal would effectively and legally enact gun control laws. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2018 (EST)

Yes. How about we create subsections between the two sections now, and simply label them by Amendment name with paragraphs on leading spokespeople (historic or contemporary) or arguments why the amendment is outdated or should be repeated? RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 21:35, 14 December 2018 (EST)