Difference between revisions of "Talk:Brett Kavanaugh"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
If it were me, I'd highlight the fact Kavanaugh sided with a so-called "women's rights" issue in the Planned Parenthood case, if only to embarrass how wrong the anti-Kavanaugh protesters were. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:49, 11 December 2018 (EST)
 
If it were me, I'd highlight the fact Kavanaugh sided with a so-called "women's rights" issue in the Planned Parenthood case, if only to embarrass how wrong the anti-Kavanaugh protesters were. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:49, 11 December 2018 (EST)
 +
 +
==Interesting link==
 +
While working on the [[Jeffrey Epstein]]/[[Clintin body count]] ([[Kenneth Starr]] worked on [https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservative-scold-ken-starr-got-a-billionaire-pedophile-off Epstein's 2008 plea deal]), I found [http://www.fbicover-up.com/justice-brett-kavanaugh.html this interesting link].  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:57, 13 August 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:57, August 13, 2019

This seems like an excellent analysis on what the Supreme Court will look like ideologically, and how Democrats and the leftist establishment will treat it, going forward with Justice Kavanaugh on the bench: [1] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:23, 10 October 2018 (EDT)

If it were me, I'd highlight the fact Kavanaugh sided with a so-called "women's rights" issue in the Planned Parenthood case, if only to embarrass how wrong the anti-Kavanaugh protesters were. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 00:49, 11 December 2018 (EST)

Interesting link

While working on the Jeffrey Epstein/Clintin body count (Kenneth Starr worked on Epstein's 2008 plea deal), I found this interesting link. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 00:57, 13 August 2019 (EDT)