Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gerontology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added talkheader template. Use this for talk pages that exists.)
m (Reverted edits by GeeksOnly (talk) to last revision by Ed Poor)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{talkheader}}
 
 
Pseudoscience? How so?
 
Pseudoscience? How so?
 
:Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
 
:Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
  
 
::There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it '''might''' still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
 
::There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it '''might''' still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:42, November 8, 2018

Pseudoscience? How so?

Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic. Karajou 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it might still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --Ed Poor Talk 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT)