Difference between revisions of "Talk:Matt Bevin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(→Worrisome signs: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*[http://www.whas11.com/story/news/local/2015/06/30/ky-clerk-defends-decision-to-decline-marriage-licenses/29538209/] | *[http://www.whas11.com/story/news/local/2015/06/30/ky-clerk-defends-decision-to-decline-marriage-licenses/29538209/] | ||
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/2/mike-huckabee-defends-kim-davis-refusal-issue-marr/]. Certainly, "omitted" is flat-out wrong, given that these were all on the front page of a search. [[User:SaulJ|SaulJ]] ([[User talk:SaulJ|talk]]) 01:12, 3 September 2015 (EDT) | *[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/2/mike-huckabee-defends-kim-davis-refusal-issue-marr/]. Certainly, "omitted" is flat-out wrong, given that these were all on the front page of a search. [[User:SaulJ|SaulJ]] ([[User talk:SaulJ|talk]]) 01:12, 3 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Worrisome signs == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think Bevin has been a great governor overall and a strong conservative, but I've noticed some worrisome developments -- first, he attended the Koch brothers' meeting: [https://www.axios.com/charles-koch-network-bipartisanship-indian-wells-meeting-0274b333-39b1-4ab1-9f93-1542041e2a61.html] Second, his lawyers (not himself, but the people he appointed) said that Kim Davis pay the legal fees of the homosexual "couples" who sued her: [https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/427710-kentucky-govs-lawyers-say-kim-davis-should-have-to-pay-gay-couples-legal] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:34, 30 January 2019 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:34, January 30, 2019
| ! | This article or part thereof was copied from Wikipedia but the copied text was originally written by me, 1990'sguy, (under the same name) and does not include alterations made by others on that site. | 
|
Clerk
The media has omitted Kim Davis' party affiliation...Democrat. --Jpatt (talk) 23:15, 2 September 2015 (EDT)
- Excellent point. Isn't that very interesting!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2015 (EDT)
- Only a small percentage of the stories clearly explain that the clerk is a Democrat. I looked at several different articles before reading that.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
- I'm having a harder time finding articles that don't mention the fact:
- Only a small percentage of the stories clearly explain that the clerk is a Democrat. I looked at several different articles before reading that.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]. Certainly, "omitted" is flat-out wrong, given that these were all on the front page of a search. SaulJ (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
Worrisome signs
I think Bevin has been a great governor overall and a strong conservative, but I've noticed some worrisome developments -- first, he attended the Koch brothers' meeting: [9] Second, his lawyers (not himself, but the people he appointed) said that Kim Davis pay the legal fees of the homosexual "couples" who sued her: [10] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:34, 30 January 2019 (EST)