Difference between revisions of "Collectivism"
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→See also: Category) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Collectivism''' is the belief that an imagined [[welfare]] of a group takes precedence over individual [[unalienable rights|rights]] and [[values]]. Collectivism is thus an example of the liberal fallacy of [[reification]]. Economic collectivism is generally preferred by [[liberals]] | + | '''Collectivism''' is the belief that an imagined [[welfare]] of a group takes precedence over individual [[unalienable rights|rights]] and [[values]]. Collectivism is thus an example of the liberal fallacy of [[reification]]. Economic collectivism is generally preferred by [[liberals]]. [[Libertarians]] often embrace [[individualism]], generally accepted as the opposite of collectivism. |
Collectivism thus is not to be confused with the fact that individual [[liberty]] allows, and love of others often enjoins, collective action. In other words, 1) civil society, beginning with the civil family, is not, by definition, [[parallel play]], but, rather, is a more-or-less informally coordinated balancing of complementary, and sometimes even conflicting, needs; whereas 2) collectivism is a consistent subsuming of the natural and civil rights of the individual, and thus of the family, to an unintelligently inflexible mere abstraction of those very rights. | Collectivism thus is not to be confused with the fact that individual [[liberty]] allows, and love of others often enjoins, collective action. In other words, 1) civil society, beginning with the civil family, is not, by definition, [[parallel play]], but, rather, is a more-or-less informally coordinated balancing of complementary, and sometimes even conflicting, needs; whereas 2) collectivism is a consistent subsuming of the natural and civil rights of the individual, and thus of the family, to an unintelligently inflexible mere abstraction of those very rights. | ||
Revision as of 17:54, August 17, 2019
Collectivism is the belief that an imagined welfare of a group takes precedence over individual rights and values. Collectivism is thus an example of the liberal fallacy of reification. Economic collectivism is generally preferred by liberals. Libertarians often embrace individualism, generally accepted as the opposite of collectivism.
Collectivism thus is not to be confused with the fact that individual liberty allows, and love of others often enjoins, collective action. In other words, 1) civil society, beginning with the civil family, is not, by definition, parallel play, but, rather, is a more-or-less informally coordinated balancing of complementary, and sometimes even conflicting, needs; whereas 2) collectivism is a consistent subsuming of the natural and civil rights of the individual, and thus of the family, to an unintelligently inflexible mere abstraction of those very rights.