Difference between revisions of "Evolution and science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: incresingly → increasingly)
(More detail, see Also section)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]].  
+
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist.
 +
 
 +
Creationists also disagree with evolution as it requires a time frame of billion/millions of years. This is incompatible with their time frame for creation of approximately 6000 years.
 +
 
  
 
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are increasingly embracing the rigid [[logic]] of [[creation science]].
 
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are increasingly embracing the rigid [[logic]] of [[creation science]].
  
 +
==See Also==
 +
[[Evolution and creation]]
 
==References==
 
==References==
  

Revision as of 15:07, August 30, 2016

Evolution and science conflict with each other. Evolution is clearly atheistic,[1] liberal pseudo or junk science which is easily disproven by the numerous counterexamples to evolution that exist.

Creationists also disagree with evolution as it requires a time frame of billion/millions of years. This is incompatible with their time frame for creation of approximately 6000 years.


Intelligent people who can distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science are increasingly embracing the rigid logic of creation science.

See Also

Evolution and creation

References