Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elizabeth Warren"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Breitbart has comprehensively busted Warren's claim to Cherokee heritage)
 
(if Hillary was unlikeable, Warren is 4X unlikeable.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Breitbart has comprehensively busted Warren's claim to Cherokee heritage: "[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/05/08/elizabeth-warren-ancestor-trail-of-tears/ Elizabeth Warren Ancestor Rounded Up Cherokees For Trail of Tears]." [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]])
 
Breitbart has comprehensively busted Warren's claim to Cherokee heritage: "[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/05/08/elizabeth-warren-ancestor-trail-of-tears/ Elizabeth Warren Ancestor Rounded Up Cherokees For Trail of Tears]." [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]])
 +
 +
[https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-elizabeth-warren-could-win-the-2020-democratic-primary/ Fivethirtyeight] has an article on Warren's 2020 chances. In her latest senate run, she was 15 points behind the site's estimate for what a generic Democratic would get. If I remember rightly, Hillary ran 4 points behind her party in her New York senate races. So if Hillary was unlikeable, Warren is 4X unlikeable. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 06:30, 4 January 2019 (EST)

Revision as of 11:30, January 4, 2019

Breitbart has comprehensively busted Warren's claim to Cherokee heritage: "Elizabeth Warren Ancestor Rounded Up Cherokees For Trail of Tears." PeterKa (talk)

Fivethirtyeight has an article on Warren's 2020 chances. In her latest senate run, she was 15 points behind the site's estimate for what a generic Democratic would get. If I remember rightly, Hillary ran 4 points behind her party in her New York senate races. So if Hillary was unlikeable, Warren is 4X unlikeable. PeterKa (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2019 (EST)