Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bestiality and Germany"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Question: There are Darwinists who are promoting/condoning and not condemning bestiality when asked about it, but there are no biblical creationists doing so. Why is that? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, 16 February 2016 (EST) | :Question: There are Darwinists who are promoting/condoning and not condemning bestiality when asked about it, but there are no biblical creationists doing so. Why is that? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, 16 February 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::This argumentation does not make sense. Only because there are some Darwinists, who promote bestiality, it does not mean that all Darwinists support it. There is no connection between evolution and bestiality.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 12:45, 17 February 2016 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:45, February 17, 2016
How is evolutionary belief related to bestiality?--JoeyJ (talk) 12:24, 16 February 2016 (EST)
- See: The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality and Belief in evolution and sexual immorality and Evolutionary belief and bestiality
- Question: There are Darwinists who are promoting/condoning and not condemning bestiality when asked about it, but there are no biblical creationists doing so. Why is that? Conservative (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2016 (EST)