Difference between revisions of "Talk:Union of Soviet Socialist Republics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Communist state is an oxymoron, and even the formal name is "Union of Soviet ''Socialist'' Republics". Stop changing this back. [[User:Thjazi|Thjazi]] 22:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | Communist state is an oxymoron, and even the formal name is "Union of Soviet ''Socialist'' Republics". Stop changing this back. [[User:Thjazi|Thjazi]] 22:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I would think the Soviet Union was a communist state. The fact that it was called socialist is irrelevant to the discussion, otherwise all states with the epithet 'democratic' should be considered to be democratic, which is of course a rather ludicrous statement. [[User:Arctic Nation|Arctic Nation]] 12:19, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:19, May 9, 2007
Why do we have 2 pages for the Soviet Union?--Elamdri 16:58, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Successor State(s)
Thjazi and I have differing opinions on which nation(s) should be viewed as successor states to the USSR. Would it just be Russia, or all 14-odd nations in the CIS? GodlessLiberal 20:46, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
Socialist State
Communist state is an oxymoron, and even the formal name is "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics". Stop changing this back. Thjazi 22:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
- I would think the Soviet Union was a communist state. The fact that it was called socialist is irrelevant to the discussion, otherwise all states with the epithet 'democratic' should be considered to be democratic, which is of course a rather ludicrous statement. Arctic Nation 12:19, 9 May 2007 (EDT)