Difference between revisions of "Talk:Budgerigar"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Cons?)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:For example, take a look at this example: "Budgerigar Comments: "i think that this website is awesome!!!! i still think that there could be a bit more information, but apart from that, this website is my favourite!!!"[http://a-z-animals.com/animals/budgerigar/] If only the article had been 200 words longer. He just wanted a bit more information. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:25, 19 September 2014 (EDT)
 
:For example, take a look at this example: "Budgerigar Comments: "i think that this website is awesome!!!! i still think that there could be a bit more information, but apart from that, this website is my favourite!!!"[http://a-z-animals.com/animals/budgerigar/] If only the article had been 200 words longer. He just wanted a bit more information. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:25, 19 September 2014 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Just came across this, Cons, and wondered:
 +
::First, how many of your articles total 600 or more words '''in your own words'''?
 +
::And, when will it be that a budgie is found because it stated its hashtag or email address or whatever instead of a phone number?
 +
::mate...[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 23:36, 1 October 2016 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 03:36, October 2, 2016

According to User:Conservative, this article has insufficient words. It seems that 600 is the minimum number these days. AlanE 02:54, 19 September 2014 (EDT)

That's what the community of web visitors want. Robust/informative articles and not stub articles. I am merely the messenger of this news. Don't kill the messenger. The public generally likes fairly informative articles or very informative articles - well organized in blocks of text so the reader can choose which sections to read pertinent to his purpose/interests.
For example, take a look at this example: "Budgerigar Comments: "i think that this website is awesome!!!! i still think that there could be a bit more information, but apart from that, this website is my favourite!!!"[1] If only the article had been 200 words longer. He just wanted a bit more information. :) Conservative 03:25, 19 September 2014 (EDT)
Just came across this, Cons, and wondered:
First, how many of your articles total 600 or more words in your own words?
And, when will it be that a budgie is found because it stated its hashtag or email address or whatever instead of a phone number?
mate...AlanE (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2016 (EDT)