Difference between revisions of "Talk:Denmark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
1. Danish politics are not liberal, not even by the terminology you are using in America. | 1. Danish politics are not liberal, not even by the terminology you are using in America. | ||
2. The geography entry sounds like Denmark is centered around the Jutland peninsula. "Two autonomous provinces with home rule are considered part of Denmark despite their distance from the Jutland Peninsula." It generally sounds wrong. | 2. The geography entry sounds like Denmark is centered around the Jutland peninsula. "Two autonomous provinces with home rule are considered part of Denmark despite their distance from the Jutland Peninsula." It generally sounds wrong. | ||
| + | [[User:JoakimV|JoakimV]] | ||
Revision as of 22:06, December 16, 2012
Now, firstly, Denmark is not socialist neither politically nor economically. Anyone who thinks so clearly lacks understanding of what exactly a socialist system entails. And secondly:
- Denmark has a ludicrously lax legal system, where criminals are barely punished, but instead they are educated and cared for by what is meant to be a penal system.
My only reaction: What? AKjeldsen 07:19, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
Hi. two issues:
1. Danish politics are not liberal, not even by the terminology you are using in America.
2. The geography entry sounds like Denmark is centered around the Jutland peninsula. "Two autonomous provinces with home rule are considered part of Denmark despite their distance from the Jutland Peninsula." It generally sounds wrong.
JoakimV