Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chevrolet Volt"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(re;)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::Your reference said nothing about the electrocution claim and stated clearly that there was as yet no scientifically proven link between hybrid vehicles and health risks. I've edited the article to reflect that. And I know what a "supercar" is. I just think it's a silly word. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:00, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
 
::Your reference said nothing about the electrocution claim and stated clearly that there was as yet no scientifically proven link between hybrid vehicles and health risks. I've edited the article to reflect that. And I know what a "supercar" is. I just think it's a silly word. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:00, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
 
::: ''"An electric shock caused by an accident-damaged EV could kill an imprudent approacher."'' [http://www.cars21.com/article.view.php?Id=344]--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:20, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
 
::: ''"An electric shock caused by an accident-damaged EV could kill an imprudent approacher."'' [http://www.cars21.com/article.view.php?Id=344]--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:20, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
 +
::::Great. Put it in the article. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:28, 13 September 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:28, September 13, 2012

Fact tags.

Those claims strike me as controversial. If they're so well-known, documenting them should not be a challenge. MattyD 20:17, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

I've provided you with references. In the future I'd stick to topics that you have some knowledge about. The fact that you didn't know what a supercar was shows that you have little if any knowledge about the automotive world. CraigF2 13:57, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Your reference said nothing about the electrocution claim and stated clearly that there was as yet no scientifically proven link between hybrid vehicles and health risks. I've edited the article to reflect that. And I know what a "supercar" is. I just think it's a silly word. MattyD 14:00, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
"An electric shock caused by an accident-damaged EV could kill an imprudent approacher." [1]--Jpatt 14:20, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Great. Put it in the article. MattyD 14:28, 13 September 2012 (EDT)