Difference between revisions of "Talk:Question evolution! campaign"
(→Booklet: new section) |
m (Reverted edits by OskarS (talk) to last revision by Conservative) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::Can someone make this change? I'm unable to edit this page for some reason. | ::Can someone make this change? I'm unable to edit this page for some reason. | ||
:::Feel free to make a stronger case for your suggestion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:44, 2 July 2012 (EDT) | :::Feel free to make a stronger case for your suggestion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:44, 2 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 05:22, September 10, 2012
Like the campaign!
I like how this is turning out; stumping evolutionists/atheists with fifteen questions based on facts and logic, while helping people to see the truth written in Genesis. Karajou 19:22, 21 May 2012 (EDT)
Question Evolution! Campaign is achieving its goal - people are questioning evolution!
American young earth creationism increased in the last two years - Gallup survey. Question evolution! campaign and other efforts of creationists are working!.[1]
It is so good to be a Bible believing creationist! It is so easy to crush the pseudoscience of evolutionism. It merely takes getting the anti-evolution message out there.[2][3] Conservative 07:34, 2 June 2012 (EDT)
"Satisfactorally" section?
I think it would be helpful to explain that, to satisfactorally answer the 15 questions, atheists would need to prove that God does not exist. I know that it is kind of implied by the sub-text, but if we're going around saying that someone hasn't satisfied a criteria we should also say what it would take to do that.
- Can someone make this change? I'm unable to edit this page for some reason.
- Feel free to make a stronger case for your suggestion. Conservative 19:44, 2 July 2012 (EDT)
- Can someone make this change? I'm unable to edit this page for some reason.