Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roseanne Barr"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Not a word about her popular, Emmy-winning television show, which ran for nine years? That's not significant enough to include in an "encyclopedia"? ~~~~")
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Not a word about her popular, Emmy-winning television show, which ran for nine years? That's not significant enough to include in an "encyclopedia"? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 23:41, 11 August 2012 (EDT)
 
Not a word about her popular, Emmy-winning television show, which ran for nine years? That's not significant enough to include in an "encyclopedia"? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 23:41, 11 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
:And you were just in there, and you could have included a reference to her show.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:23, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
::Why bother when it's much more fun to point out how stupid your website is? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 10:49, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::Hahahaha Roasted! [[User:Ethan Parmet|Ethan Parmet]] 3:19, 26 may 2020 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 19:19, May 26, 2020

Not a word about her popular, Emmy-winning television show, which ran for nine years? That's not significant enough to include in an "encyclopedia"? CasparRH 23:41, 11 August 2012 (EDT)

And you were just in there, and you could have included a reference to her show. Karajou 00:23, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
Why bother when it's much more fun to point out how stupid your website is? CasparRH 10:49, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
Hahahaha Roasted! Ethan Parmet 3:19, 26 may 2020 (EDT)