Difference between revisions of "Template talk:ConservapediaBible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Word Analysis: new section) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) m (Conservative moved page Template talk:ConservativeBible to Template talk:ConservapediaBible) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Word Analysis == | == Word Analysis == | ||
| − | I am adding a link to [Word Analysis of Bible] because I think it is important that we can quickly get to the page if we are supposed to be using it. --[[User:SamF|SamF]] 22:43, 19 January 2010 (EST) | + | I am adding a link to [[Word Analysis of Bible]] because I think it is important that we can quickly get to the page if we are supposed to be using it. --[[User:SamF|SamF]] 22:43, 19 January 2010 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 17:35, April 10, 2017
This template is messing with the first chapter of all of the books which are short enough to not be broken up. What does everybody think of making this a across the bottom (or even an across the top) template, so that we won't have our tables narrowed by it? JacobB 18:36, 20 December 2009 (EST)
Word Analysis
I am adding a link to Word Analysis of Bible because I think it is important that we can quickly get to the page if we are supposed to be using it. --SamF 22:43, 19 January 2010 (EST)