Difference between revisions of "Common fallacies"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(expanded definition)
(→‎top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: For example → For example,)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Common fallacies''' are arguments that have a [[logical fallacy]] inherit in them, yet are still commonly accepted. These arguments persuade and fool people who:
+
'''Common fallacies''' are arguments that have a [[logical fallacy]] inherent in them, yet are still commonly accepted by people who:
  
 
*have difficulties with abstract thinking
 
*have difficulties with abstract thinking
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
*a theory should be accepted until a better alternative is found
 
*a theory should be accepted until a better alternative is found
−
*rates of recession or decay observed today are somehow constant for extrapolation backwards in time
+
*rates of recession, decay or growth observed today are somehow constant for extrapolation backwards in time
 
*higher taxes must produce more revenue for the government
 
*higher taxes must produce more revenue for the government
 
*fewer guns must reduce the rate of crime
 
*fewer guns must reduce the rate of crime
 
*choice is somehow meaningful regardless of whether it is informed
 
*choice is somehow meaningful regardless of whether it is informed
 
*human thought can answer any question
 
*human thought can answer any question
 +
*loaded questions: embodies an assumption that, if answered, indicates an implied agreement. (e.g., Have you stopped beating your wife yet?)
 +
*Appeal to Misleading Authority: When a person believes a claim to be true simply because an "authority" says so, when that "authority" is not actually an authority on the subject at hand. For example, if somebody believes a claim about chemistry to be true simply because a psychologist says it is true. What constitutes an authority is debatable.
  
 
(please add and improve)
 
(please add and improve)
−
 
+
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&action=edit HERE]
−
[[Category:Fallacies]]
+
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Latest revision as of 18:26, July 14, 2016

Common fallacies are arguments that have a logical fallacy inherent in them, yet are still commonly accepted by people who:

  • have difficulties with abstract thinking
  • are young students, or are adults unwilling to reconsider opinions they formed as students
  • exercise their free will to embrace fallacies without concern for whether they are flawed

Examples of common fallacies are:

  • a theory should be accepted until a better alternative is found
  • rates of recession, decay or growth observed today are somehow constant for extrapolation backwards in time
  • higher taxes must produce more revenue for the government
  • fewer guns must reduce the rate of crime
  • choice is somehow meaningful regardless of whether it is informed
  • human thought can answer any question
  • loaded questions: embodies an assumption that, if answered, indicates an implied agreement. (e.g., Have you stopped beating your wife yet?)
  • Appeal to Misleading Authority: When a person believes a claim to be true simply because an "authority" says so, when that "authority" is not actually an authority on the subject at hand. For example, if somebody believes a claim about chemistry to be true simply because a psychologist says it is true. What constitutes an authority is debatable.

(please add and improve) HERE