Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bush Doctrine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
QuickFixer (talk | contribs) (Please don't poison the well with snide remarks against other unnamed admins.) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The concept known as the "Bush Doctrine" did not become popular just a few days ago with Charles Gibson's interview of Palin. It was first coined in 2002 in a NY Times article found here http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE3DE123CF930A25757C0A9649C8B63. Granted the Bush Doctrine is not as well defined as say the Truman Doctrine, but the term has certainly been in use for years. I would edit the page directly, but I would most likely fall victim to a banning.--[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 23:42, 15 September 2008 (EDT) | The concept known as the "Bush Doctrine" did not become popular just a few days ago with Charles Gibson's interview of Palin. It was first coined in 2002 in a NY Times article found here http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE3DE123CF930A25757C0A9649C8B63. Granted the Bush Doctrine is not as well defined as say the Truman Doctrine, but the term has certainly been in use for years. I would edit the page directly, but I would most likely fall victim to a banning.--[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 23:42, 15 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
:You're correct AmesdrasK. Please edit the article and make it factual. Remember, cite your sources. If you do this, you need not fear becoming a block victim. Thanks. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 23:47, 15 September 2008 (EDT) | :You're correct AmesdrasK. Please edit the article and make it factual. Remember, cite your sources. If you do this, you need not fear becoming a block victim. Thanks. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 23:47, 15 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Will do (cannot do it right now due to time pressures, but I will later tonight). Thanks for the assurance against a block, unfortunately, I see more and more ideological blocking everyday. Good to see that some sysops abide by their own rules! --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 07:06, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Please don't poison the well with snide remarks against other unnamed admins. [[User:QuickFixer|QuickFixer]] 11:50, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:50, September 16, 2008
Completely Untrue
The concept known as the "Bush Doctrine" did not become popular just a few days ago with Charles Gibson's interview of Palin. It was first coined in 2002 in a NY Times article found here http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE3DE123CF930A25757C0A9649C8B63. Granted the Bush Doctrine is not as well defined as say the Truman Doctrine, but the term has certainly been in use for years. I would edit the page directly, but I would most likely fall victim to a banning.--AndrasK 23:42, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
- You're correct AmesdrasK. Please edit the article and make it factual. Remember, cite your sources. If you do this, you need not fear becoming a block victim. Thanks. HenryS 23:47, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
- Will do (cannot do it right now due to time pressures, but I will later tonight). Thanks for the assurance against a block, unfortunately, I see more and more ideological blocking everyday. Good to see that some sysops abide by their own rules! --AndrasK 07:06, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Please don't poison the well with snide remarks against other unnamed admins. QuickFixer 11:50, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Will do (cannot do it right now due to time pressures, but I will later tonight). Thanks for the assurance against a block, unfortunately, I see more and more ideological blocking everyday. Good to see that some sysops abide by their own rules! --AndrasK 07:06, 16 September 2008 (EDT)