Difference between revisions of "Talk:WikiIndex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I thought that Conservapedia ''had'' a Fundamentalist Christian point of view. That doesn't mean that it's against other religions, but it's not an inaccurate statement given the "Bible V...) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I thought that Conservapedia ''had'' a Fundamentalist Christian point of view. That doesn't mean that it's against other religions, but it's not an inaccurate statement given the "Bible Verse" section on the main page, and that the most popular articles include [[Jesus Christ]], [[Bible]], [[Christianity]], and [[Young Earth Creationism]]. The fact that the Bible is cited so often as a trusted source in various articles also backs up that view. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 18:07, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | + | I thought that Conservapedia ''had'' a Fundamentalist Christian point of view. That doesn't mean that it's against other religions, but it's not an inaccurate statement given the "Bible Verse" section on the main page, and that the most popular articles include [[Jesus Christ]], [[Bible]], [[Christianity]], and [[Young Earth Creationism]]. The fact that the Bible is cited so often as a trusted source in various articles also backs up that view. |
| + | |||
| + | What I'm curious about, then, is why this is considered a ''criticism'' of CP when to many here it seems to be a point of pride? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 18:07, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I put it up there because they use it as slight. They could have just said a Christian POV, but choose differently. It is obvious that they have bias against Conservapedia. Their criticism section mocks CP numerous times.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 18:15, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:15, July 30, 2008
I thought that Conservapedia had a Fundamentalist Christian point of view. That doesn't mean that it's against other religions, but it's not an inaccurate statement given the "Bible Verse" section on the main page, and that the most popular articles include Jesus Christ, Bible, Christianity, and Young Earth Creationism. The fact that the Bible is cited so often as a trusted source in various articles also backs up that view.
What I'm curious about, then, is why this is considered a criticism of CP when to many here it seems to be a point of pride? --DinsdaleP 18:07, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
- I put it up there because they use it as slight. They could have just said a Christian POV, but choose differently. It is obvious that they have bias against Conservapedia. Their criticism section mocks CP numerous times.--jp 18:15, 30 July 2008 (EDT)