|
|
| (35 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | {{protect|DeanS}} |
| | + | For older discussions, see the [[Talk:Human reproduction/archive1]] |
| | + | |
| | Blimey, this was an ommision. Requires expansion and illustration. | | Blimey, this was an ommision. Requires expansion and illustration. |
| | | | |
| − | :Let's work on this behind the scenes and try to come up with something suitable for all ages.
| + | =Biological Aspects= |
| − | | + | It should be above spiritual aspects. [[User:JonM|JonM]] 23:15, 10 January 2012 (EST) |
| − | :Draft is [[/draft|here]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | : Where did "X" come from? I wrote penis, which is surely not going to warp anyones mind. We need to write about the penis and the vagina. There is nothing crude in these things.[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] (EDT) | |
| − | | |
| − | I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Dont be disgusting, I dont want my child going on the internet and reading smut and filth! Conservapedia needs to be kept clean. This article is completely unnecceassary and should be removed. Anyone suggesting "penis" is not a rude word has obviously been going to michael moore school of family values. [[warmonkey]] Jan 11 2008
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Please be satire, please be satire... [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:01, 17 January 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :Please, please, please... [[User:ProserpinaFC|ProserpinaFC]]
| |
| − | :You have got to be joking... Right...? A common-sense, clear, scientific explanation of how the human race multiplies itself should be curriculum. And if penis is a rude word, the same should go for knee, toe, shoulder and all other body parts. It is no more than a completely ordinary part of the human body. I see your concern; there are far too much pornography in this world. The Wikipedia sites on these subjects are - IMHO - great examples of how this should be. Clear, honest descriptions of the things all parents have been through. Some say that parents should teach their children those things... My experience as a teacher is that kids want to hear this from everyone but their parents. And obviously... If the human race are going to last, they have got to learn it somehow... Unless they want to end up like a dutch couple who grew up in a strictly conservative christian enviroment. Somehow they expected that kids would turn up... And when this did not seem to happen, they went to a doctor - shows up they had never heard about what their genitalia were made for...[[tangentus]] Apr 07 2008
| |
| − | | |
| − | Penis is not a dirty word in and of itself. It has dirty connotations, sure, but it is a scientific term. In some situations the context can lend a rude meaning but there is no other way to describe intercourse. Are we going to beat around the bush like 5th graders by saying some ridiculous euphemism? - [[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] - 27 Feb. 2008
| |
| − | | |
| − | I suggest changing this page to something along the lines of "Oh you mean the birds and the bees. Well when a bird sees a bee it eats it, so stay away from birds or else." That way the only imagery is of two things that came straight off Noah's ark. And it gives a teenagers a realistic reason to avoid sex. [[User:Rellik|Rellik]] 21:38, 12 March 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | How about we use the word "vagina" but not "penis". Surely one is more disgusting than the other? Or alternatively "foo-foo" and "special rod" respectively.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Criticism of liberals==
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Some [[liberal]] "families" may reproduce outside of marriage or unions, but these "families" are prone to dissolution, drugs, violence, pedophilia, mental illness and [[liberal values]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | Shouldn't this go in the [[Family]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:13, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Having children==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Most Christians believe that giving birth to children (bringing a new life into the world) is much more than "perpetuating the [[species]]" - as if ''[[homo sapiens]]'' were a kind of organism at risk for extinction! I think this article has adopted too much of Wikipedia's materialism.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Not that I'm blaming anybody. The [[:Category:Life Sciences]] have been taught in rather a materialistic way for many decades now, and it's hard to be "encyclopedic" and overcome that bias at the same time. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:10, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
| |
