Difference between revisions of "User talk:DeanS"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Tribute to Dean==
-Dean, I realise that messing with someone else's talk page is not done, and so I apologise, but thought that on this occasion it was more important to say this.
-Conservapedia is an important project, and it needs you. You have been a very active contributor, and an inspirational and fair minded sysop: we cannot afford to lose people of your calibre. I appreciate that your faith and attachment to the Mormon creed have led you to this, but I appeal to you to reconsider: stand up for your faith on this ground, as you have done so far and been a fine ambassador for your church; and return to help continue building up Conservapedia into a great force for good. You have done so much already: please consider how much more there is to be done. Thanks for reading! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 06:09, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
-==Request to come back==
-Dean, you have my support as well as that of Learn Together. I have laid down some ground rules at [[talk:Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] which I invite you to glance at. Please have confidence in me! I have an unbroken track record of success in every dispute I've mediated at wiki encyclopedias when I've been a sysop.
-After you cool off, I do hope you will consider making another try. We can do this together. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:01, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
-==Clarification==
-Mr. DeanS, I am in no way attempting to humiliate you or anger you. I am simply posting on the LDS church with material that is historically accurate. Now, I've studied this stuff for a while now, but I know that you are a Mormon and it is very possible that you know far more than I do on the subject. So, if you wish to discuss the edits, or are able to show me where I am wrong with documentation, then I'll take my stuff out. But, I simply wanted to clarify that I'm not trying to attack you. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 15:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
-:You are one step away from being blocked. And before you post anywhere but on a sysop talk page, you better apologize for:
-:#Attacking Dean
-:#Lying, while saying your attack "was not an attack"
-:#Using "historical" material as if it were obviously current and official.
-:#Making such a fuss over the burden of proof.
-:You do not dictate the terms under which you participate. Do what I say, or be elsewhere. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:04, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
-:: Given that your accusations against him are not self-evidently true (to me they appear to be totally unfounded), then you need to demonstrate that he is guilty of those charges.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:07, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
-==Request to come back==
-Amen, good sir. I am a Catholic, and a Progressive one at that, and I cannot understand why others who claim to be Christians feel that it is their prerogative to declare whether my views on Jesus and his teachings are valid or not. I admire your stance. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 00:04, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
-: I accept that Catholics can be Christians, and I think I disagree with Ultimahero on that, but what I don't accept is what is implied in your comment, that we should accept as Christian anyone who claims that label regardless of whether their beliefs are consistent with biblical teaching.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:10, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Difference between revisions of "User talk:DeanS"

Latest revision as of 18:39, June 20, 2017

Navigation menu

Search