Difference between revisions of "Talk:Environmental alarmism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Planet Slayer)
 
(Ideological?)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Has anyone else tried out the environmental calculator? Apparently I should have died after 10.2 years. It's pretty faulty though, it shows that using a taxi emits less carbon compounds than using a bicycle and walking...  It may be worth noting that the site is targeted at children (it's run by ABC Kids). [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 06:47, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Has anyone else tried out the environmental calculator? Apparently I should have died after 10.2 years. It's pretty faulty though, it shows that using a taxi emits less carbon compounds than using a bicycle and walking...  It may be worth noting that the site is targeted at children (it's run by ABC Kids). [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 06:47, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Ideological? ==
 +
 +
*I fail to see how adding the stub template here is "ideological."  I added the template because, as it stands, this is not an article, but a list of quotes and links.  If there were any actual content, I would not have added it.  (Usual disclaimers, I reserve the right to completely ignore any response, etc., etc.; I'm not even going to bother re-adding the template.) -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 22:44, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 02:44, June 7, 2008

Planet Slayer

Has anyone else tried out the environmental calculator? Apparently I should have died after 10.2 years. It's pretty faulty though, it shows that using a taxi emits less carbon compounds than using a bicycle and walking... It may be worth noting that the site is targeted at children (it's run by ABC Kids). StatsMsn 06:47, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Ideological?

  • I fail to see how adding the stub template here is "ideological." I added the template because, as it stands, this is not an article, but a list of quotes and links. If there were any actual content, I would not have added it. (Usual disclaimers, I reserve the right to completely ignore any response, etc., etc.; I'm not even going to bother re-adding the template.) -CSGuy 22:44, 6 June 2008 (EDT)