Difference between revisions of "Daniel Pipes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Sudden Jihad Syndrome: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.nysun.com → https://www.nysun.com)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:DPc.jpg|right|thumb|200px]]
 
[[Image:DPc.jpg|right|thumb|200px]]
−
'''Daniel Pipes''' is a an influential academic and counter-terrorism expert. He holds a PhD in medieval [[Islamic]] history from [[Harvard University]].
+
'''Daniel Pipes''' is an influential academic and counter-terrorism expert. He holds a PhD in medieval [[Islamic]] history from [[Harvard University]]. Daniel Pipes founded [[Campus watch|Campus Watch]] in 2002.
  
 
==Sudden Jihad Syndrome==
 
==Sudden Jihad Syndrome==
−
''Main article: [[Sudden Jihad Syndrome]]''
+
{{Main|Sudden Jihad Syndrome}}
  
−
From the NNDB entry on Pipes:
+
"Sudden Jihad Syndrome" is a term Pipes coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [https://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this alleged phenomenon all Islamists must be considered potential terrorists.<ref>"Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
−
 
 
−
''"Totally obsessed with Islamic extremists well before September 11, Daniel Pipes has made it his life's work to convince the western world that there can be no bargaining with Arab fanatics -- they must simply be rooted out and destroyed. He was a major proponent of the Iraq invasion, claiming that it would have very positive consequences for "militant Islam, the energy market, the Israeli conflict, the general problem of the Arab states modernizing, you name it."
 
−
 
 
−
In the March 2002 issue of Insight magazine, Pipes predicted that violence would soon cease in Israel: "Probably [during] this calendar year the Palestinians will realize they are getting nowhere and just stop." Maybe it was this sense of optimism that led President Bush in 2003 to nominate Pipes to the United States Institute of Peace."''
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
"Sudden Jihad Syndrome" is a term Pipes coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Islamists must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 22: Line 15:
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Pipes, Daniel}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Pipes, Daniel}}
  
−
[[category:journalists]]
+
[[Category:Journalists]]
−
[[category:authors]]
+
[[Category:American Authors]]
 
[[Category:Political Scientists]]
 
[[Category:Political Scientists]]

Latest revision as of 07:04, April 9, 2019

DPc.jpg

Daniel Pipes is an influential academic and counter-terrorism expert. He holds a PhD in medieval Islamic history from Harvard University. Daniel Pipes founded Campus Watch in 2002.

Sudden Jihad Syndrome

For a more detailed treatment, see Sudden Jihad Syndrome.

"Sudden Jihad Syndrome" is a term Pipes coined to describe Muslims that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.[1] Pipes has argued that due to this alleged phenomenon all Islamists must be considered potential terrorists.[2]

References

  1. ↑ "...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [1]
  2. ↑ "Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [2]

Further reading